- Literature - May 24
UChicago to honor historian Black, theater director Bogart at Convocation - Agronomy - May 24
Diagnostic labs analyze anything from bugs to toenails - Medicine - May 24
UCLA launches first face transplantation program in western U.S - Administration - May 24
’Click It or Ticket’ Enforcement on Penn Campus - Medicine - May 24
Hormone Plays Surprise Role in Fighting Skin Infections - Pedagogy - May 24
Two SEAS profs envision the next big ideas in teaching and learning - Environmental Sciences - May 24
Columbia's Manhattanville Campus Earns LEED Platinum for Neighborhood Plan - Literature - May 24
Historic Greek Theatre safe, sound and superb after upgrades - Law - May 24
Latest UT/Texas Tribune Poll: Tax Pledge Issue Reveals Conservative Divide - Computer Science - May 24
SDSC to Host "Summer Institute" Supercomputer Workshop August 6-10 - Earth Sciences - May 24
SDSC to Host Summer Institute for Geosciences August 6-10 - Arts - May 24
Center for the Art of Performance at UCLA announces 2012-13 season
By category
Official EventAdministration
Chemistry
Physics
Computer Science
Environmental Sciences
Earth Sciences
Life Sciences
Medicine
Business
Law
Literature
History
Arts
» » more
New book says financial model for higher ed is broken, offers ways to overhaul
21 February 2012 - WASHINGTON
Higher education, a jewel of American society and an engine of its economy, is under threat, and if the nation is to remain competitive the financial model must be overhauled, says a new book.
To begin, the authors say, needy students, many of whom belong to fast-growing ethnic groups underrepresented in colleges, must be convinced that college is a realistic goal. Zumeta said early commitment programs like Washington’s College Bound scholarship make sense.
He and his co-authors say the country should devote more policy attention to the types of institutions that educate most undergraduate students. For example, as part of his 2013 budget, President Obama proposed an $8 billion Community College Career Fund with a goal of 2 million workers trained for jobs in high-demand industries.
“This is the sort of attention to broad-access institutions that we need,” Zumeta said.
But that’s only part of the equation. In aggregate, inflation-adjusted terms, state support of higher education is substantially lower per student than in the 1980s. Students and their families are being forced to pay more of the costs.
Zumeta and his colleagues say student aid policies must be redesigned so they stop encouraging states to let tuition spiral upward as state support falls, pricing many families out of the college market and leading to dropouts. In late January, Obama proposed a financial aid overhaul that for the first time would tie colleges’ eligibility for campus-based aid programs to success in improving value and affordability for students. But, Zumeta said, the president overlooked the key intermediary role played by state budgetary decisions. And both Obama proposals require congressional approval.
Attention also needs to be focused on graduation rates, the authors say. Limited state support for higher education needs to provide incentives for both enrollment and graduation, which has not been done in the past. Less than 60 percent of Caucasian students finish college, members of fast-growing ethnic groups (especially Hispanics) have much lower graduation rates, and completion rates for those beginning at two-year colleges are quite low. In 2020, when the economy will be even more knowledge-based, the workforce could be less educated than in 2000 – and it could include a substantial number of people without even a high school diploma. By comparison, nine countries, including Finland, Poland and Slovakia, now best the U.S. in postsecondary degree attainment rates, whereas the U.S. was second just 10 years ago.
Along with overhauling financing arrangements and encouraging students and their families to prepare for college, new ways to provide access are necessary, say the authors. Online courses are one way; credibly certifying skills and knowledge gained outside of traditional schools could be another. All post-secondary preparation need not occur in traditional colleges.
But it still gets down to money. Without demonstrated societal returns in the form of degrees in demand, say Zumeta and his colleagues, hard-pressed politicians and taxpayers won’t shell out more for higher education. Also, to win more taxpayer support, the entire educational system needs to become more visibly efficient. This means creating better alignment between K-12 and higher education, and providing hard data on policies and methods that improve learning and degree attainment. Better data and new K-16 data systems make such improvements both possible and demonstrable.
All of this is important, the authors say, because higher education generates ideas that lead to new processes and products that drive the economy. But more basically, such education enables people to understand interlinked technical and cultural systems and thereby compete globally.
To construct a new model, the authors say, the nation requires a coalition of well-informed, influential leaders determined to change financing of higher education and bring the public along. The Obama ideas for sharply increasing degree attainment make a great deal of sense, Zumeta said, but the model for higher education needs a top-level coalition focused on complete overhaul of access, affordability and attainment, regardless of who is in the White House.
In his foreword to the book, former North Carolina Gov. James B. Hunt said, “The issues raised in this volume challenge America to realign college finance with core public values. This is a critical 21st century agenda for higher education and public policy.”
“Political and educational leaders of the 21st century need to read this book,” said Paul E. Lingenfelter, president of the State Higher Education Executive Officers.
He and his co-authors say the country should devote more policy attention to the types of institutions that educate most undergraduate students. For example, as part of his 2013 budget, President Obama proposed an $8 billion Community College Career Fund with a goal of 2 million workers trained for jobs in high-demand industries.
“This is the sort of attention to broad-access institutions that we need,” Zumeta said.
But that’s only part of the equation. In aggregate, inflation-adjusted terms, state support of higher education is substantially lower per student than in the 1980s. Students and their families are being forced to pay more of the costs.
Zumeta and his colleagues say student aid policies must be redesigned so they stop encouraging states to let tuition spiral upward as state support falls, pricing many families out of the college market and leading to dropouts. In late January, Obama proposed a financial aid overhaul that for the first time would tie colleges’ eligibility for campus-based aid programs to success in improving value and affordability for students. But, Zumeta said, the president overlooked the key intermediary role played by state budgetary decisions. And both Obama proposals require congressional approval.
Attention also needs to be focused on graduation rates, the authors say. Limited state support for higher education needs to provide incentives for both enrollment and graduation, which has not been done in the past. Less than 60 percent of Caucasian students finish college, members of fast-growing ethnic groups (especially Hispanics) have much lower graduation rates, and completion rates for those beginning at two-year colleges are quite low. In 2020, when the economy will be even more knowledge-based, the workforce could be less educated than in 2000 – and it could include a substantial number of people without even a high school diploma. By comparison, nine countries, including Finland, Poland and Slovakia, now best the U.S. in postsecondary degree attainment rates, whereas the U.S. was second just 10 years ago.
Along with overhauling financing arrangements and encouraging students and their families to prepare for college, new ways to provide access are necessary, say the authors. Online courses are one way; credibly certifying skills and knowledge gained outside of traditional schools could be another. All post-secondary preparation need not occur in traditional colleges.
But it still gets down to money. Without demonstrated societal returns in the form of degrees in demand, say Zumeta and his colleagues, hard-pressed politicians and taxpayers won’t shell out more for higher education. Also, to win more taxpayer support, the entire educational system needs to become more visibly efficient. This means creating better alignment between K-12 and higher education, and providing hard data on policies and methods that improve learning and degree attainment. Better data and new K-16 data systems make such improvements both possible and demonstrable.
All of this is important, the authors say, because higher education generates ideas that lead to new processes and products that drive the economy. But more basically, such education enables people to understand interlinked technical and cultural systems and thereby compete globally.
To construct a new model, the authors say, the nation requires a coalition of well-informed, influential leaders determined to change financing of higher education and bring the public along. The Obama ideas for sharply increasing degree attainment make a great deal of sense, Zumeta said, but the model for higher education needs a top-level coalition focused on complete overhaul of access, affordability and attainment, regardless of who is in the White House.
In his foreword to the book, former North Carolina Gov. James B. Hunt said, “The issues raised in this volume challenge America to realign college finance with core public values. This is a critical 21st century agenda for higher education and public policy.”
“Political and educational leaders of the 21st century need to read this book,” said Paul E. Lingenfelter, president of the State Higher Education Executive Officers.
Last job offers
- Law - 21.5
Doctoral Programme at the Law School of the University of Basel - Life Sciences - 18.4
Senior Expert - Genetic Biomarker Oncology (PhD) m/f - Business - 22.5
Research Associate - Civil Engineering - 15.5
Research Specialist - Beckman Institute (A1200274) - Life Sciences - 15.5
Staff Research Associate II - Medicine - 12.5
Research Specialist - Business - 4.5
Assistant Professor of Economics, Non Tenure Track, Fall 2012 - Business - 3.5
Post Doctoral Fellow



» Share this page: