- Careers - May 17 Latest news on planned strike by patient- care workers unions at UC, UCLA
- Administration - May 17
Getting to the bottom of how oceans breathe - Education - May 17
Faculty Senate explores the future of the doctoral degree - Microtechnics - May 17
Engineers’ new nanoscavenger purifies water, gets retrieved by magnet - Arts - May 17 Stanford adds two new freshman living, learning programs
- Medicine - May 17 Youth bullying because of perceived sexual orientation widespread and damaging
- Administration - May 17 Minnesota legislative conferees and Gov. Dayton support U of M requests to freeze tuition and invest in leading research
- Administration - May 17 Ingleside Post Office closes; alternate postal options available
- Pedagogy - May 17 New YaleNews website celebrates classroom teaching
- Life Sciences - May 17 Gene modification technology developed at University of Minnesota and Iowa State University receives patents
- Earth Sciences - May 17 U-M experts available to discuss Canadian earthquake felt in Michigan today
Ethics framework urged to manage conflicts of interest in medicine
13 June 2012
A recent international study led by researchers from McGill University and the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) examines the complex and controversial interplay of conflicts of interest between physician experts, medicine and the pharmaceutical or medical device industry. The results of the analysis, which are published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, aim to advance the management of conflicts of interest in medical guidelines.
Over the last decade governments, medical specialty societies and academia have increasingly confronted an ethical dilemma in the development of influential, independent, expert medical guidelines, says lead author, Derek J. Jones of McGill University’s Faculty of Law Research Group on Health and the Law.
According to the study, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on heart conditions, mental disorders, flu and diabetes have been criticized, questioned or annulled because of Conflicts of Interest (COIs) issues in the US, Canada, France and World Health Organization. Should physician experts who have, or had, financial relations with industry be included, excluded, or limited from the development of international clinical practice guidelines, Jones asks. What if their expertise is rare, unique or essential?
The interdisciplinary project developed and analyzed the impact of an ethics framework designed to manage COIs in an international CPG on gastroenterology. They found the initiative fruitful, if challenging. Given the absence of uniform COI definitions, procedures or standards in the international arena, we found that an ethics framework helps to identify COIs, ethics issues, and COI management options in the process, explains Jones.
"We further sought to measure the impact of COIs on voting and discussing the CPG recommendations, explained Alan Barkun, corresponding author of the study and chief of gastroenterology at the MUHC and professor of medicine at McGill. Our analysis of the COI management tool used revealed little impact on voting recommendations for the guideline and some impact on discussion. These important issues demand further analysis and initiatives.
The study thus recommends targeted research, the use of ethics frameworks, a financing model, and international and institutional policy initiatives to better manage conflicts of interest in the development of future CPGs.
About this study:
The study "Conflicts of Interest Ethics: Silencing Expertise in the Development of International Clinical Practice Guidelines" was coauthored by Derek J. Jones, JD; Alan N. Barkun, MDCM, MSc (Clinical Epidemiology); Yidan Lu, MDCM; Robert Enns, MD; Paul Sinclair, MSc; Myriam Martel, BSc; Ian Gralnek, MD; Marc Bardou, MD, PhD; Ernst J. Kuipers, MD; and Joseph Sung, MD, PhD, for the International Consensus Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Conference Group
The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology also provided in-kind support and administered the meeting.
Related links:
Last job offers
- Medicine - 18.5
Assistant Professor, Health Policy 1 - Medicine - 18.5
Assistant Professor, Health Policy 2 - Law - 18.5
Assistant or Associate Professor - Law - 18.5
Assistant or Associate Professor - Business - 18.5
Assistant Professor - Business - Medicine - 17.5
Neurology - Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor WOT (AA3458) - Medicine - 17.5
Medical Oncology - Assistant or Associate Professor WOT (AA3460) - Medicine - 17.5
Arlene Holden Chair in Breast Cancer Research







» Share this page: